Primary stability of implants inserted following sinus lift and bone graft in the posterior of the maxilla
-
Mehdi Sezavar
,
Mohammad Reza Soleimanpour
,
Fahimeh Koshki
,
Seyedeh Zahra Shakeri
,
Mohammad Moharrami
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the primary stability of implants inserted conventionally with those inserted following sinus lift plus bone graft.Materials and Methods: The data consisted of periotest scores from 12 patients (7 women, 5 men, mean age of 47.8±10.4) and 24 implants. Each patient had 1 implant which was insertedconventionally and another using sinus lift (lateral window) and bone graft, therefore, each patient rolled as control as well as case group for him/herself. Eight patients had surgery on the right side and other 4 on the left side. After 4 months of surgery, primary stability was measured by periotest at 3 points. Radiographs also were served to evaluate success rate of each technique. The patientswere collected from a private clinic during 8 months. Mann-Whitney U test was served for analysis; P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.Results: The difference between diameters and lengths of implants between case and control group was insignificant (p>0.05). The mean score of periotest for case and control group was -2.73±1.52 and -4.31 ±1.99 respectively. Although the primary stability was higher in the control group and Mann-Whitney U analysis showed a significant difference (p<0.05), but as both scores were negative, primary stability was acceptable in the case group as well.Conclusion: Despite the lower primary stability of implants inserted in regions with a sinus lift and graft, the technique is acceptable and clinically efficient.Key words: Implant, Sinus lift, Graft, Primary stability.Wehrbein H, Diedrich P. [Progressive pneumati- zation of the basal maxillary sinus after extraction and space closure]. Fortschr Kieferorthop.1992;53(2):77-83.
Rios HF, Avila G, Galindo P, Bratu E, Wang H-L.The influence of remaining alveolar bone upon lateral window sinus augmentation implant sur-vival. Implant Dent. 2009;18(5):402-12.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Dental implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcome accord- ing to the initial clinical situation and a proposal of defect classification. Clin Oral Implants Res.2008;19(4):416-28.
Beretta M, Cicciu M, Bramanti E, Maiorana C.Schneider membrane elevation in presence of si-nus septa: Anatomic features and surgical man-agement. International journal of dentistry.2012;2012.
Misch CE. Bone density. Implants and Restorative Dentistry. 2001:79.
Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev.2001;38(2):175-82.
Bornstein MM, Chappuis V, Von Arx T, Buser D.Performance of dental implants after staged si-nus floor elevation procedures: 5‐year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(10):1034-43.
Cricchio G, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus mem- brane elevation and implant placement: a 1‐to 6‐year follow‐up study. Clin Oral Implants Res.2011;22(10):1200-12.
Hatano N, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Sinus Membrane El- evation and Peripheral Venous Blood for Implant‐ Supported Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posteri- or Maxilla: Case Series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9(3):150-5.
Rickert D, Sauerbier S, Nagursky H, Menne D, Vissink A, Raghoebar G. Maxillary sinus floor el- evation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells:a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(3):251-8.
Thor A, Sennerby L, Hirsch JM, Rasmusson LBone formation at the maxillary sinus floor fol- lowing simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft ma-terial: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2007;65(7):64-72.
Martínez-Conde R, Eguia A, Uribarri A, López-Vi- cente J, Aguirre JM. Multiple window access an- trostomy in maxillary sinus grafting. Presentation of a clinical serie of 10 cases and literature review.1989.
Hakobyan G, Khachatryan A. Maxillary sinus augmentation using vertical bone condensing. EUROMEDICA. 2010:65.
Gahleitner A, Hofschneider U, Tepper G, Pretter- klieber M, Schick S, Zauza K, et al. Lingual Vascu- lar Canals of the Mandible: Evaluation with Den- tal CT 1. Radiology. 2001;220(1):186-9.
O’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque con- trol record. J Periodontol. 1972;43(1):38
Lekholm U, Zarb G. Tissue-Integrated Prosthe- ses Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry/Eds PI Branemark et al. Chicago; 1985.
Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor ele- vation and survival of implants inserted in combi- nation with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodon- tol. 2008;35(s8):216-40.
Palma VC, Magro‐Filho O, Oliveria D, Américo J, Lundgren S, Salata LA, et al. Bone reforma- tion and implant integration following maxil- lary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study in primates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2006;8(1):11-24.
Ellegaard B, Kølsen‐petersen J, Baelum V. Implant therapy involving maxillary sinus lift in periodon- tally compromised patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(4):305-15.
Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, et al. Development of Im- plant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation–results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 3, No 4 (Autumn 2016) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Implant Sinus lift Graft Primary stability. | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
