Two-point osteotomy technique in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of mandible
Abstract
Today bilateral sagittal split osteotomy technique is one of the main surgical methods used in mandibular deformities surgical correction. Since, the osteotomy design has an important role in decreasing BSSO complications, we developed a technique which restrict the osteotomy points to posterior medial ramus cut and anterior vertical cut in widely used hunsuck modification for decreasing the complications.Keywords: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Orthognathic surgery; Skeletal deformity.
References
1. Obwegeser H. Zur Operationstechnik bei der Progenie und anderer Unterkieferanomalien. Dtsch, Z Mund Kieferheilk. 1955;23:1-26.
2. Verweij JP, Houppermans PN, Gooris P, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JR. Risk factors for common complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;44(9):1170-80.
3. Hunsuck E. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1968;26:249-52.
4. Veras R, Kriwalsky M, Hoffmann S, Maurer P, Schubert J. Functional and radiographic long-term results after bad split in orthognathic surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2008;37(7):606-11.
5. Chrcanovic BR, Freire-Maia B. Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2012;16(1):19-27.
6. Politis C, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, Vrielinck L, Schepers S, Agbaje JO. Attachment rate of the inferior alveolar nerve to buccal plate during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy influences self-reported sensory impairment. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2014;25(6):2121-6.
7. Theodossy T, Jackson O, Petrie A, Lloyd T. Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal following sagittal split osteotomy. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2006;35(7):598-601.
1. Obwegeser H. Zur Operationstechnik bei der Progenie und anderer Unterkieferanomalien. Dtsch, Z Mund Kieferheilk. 1955;23:1-26.
2. Verweij JP, Houppermans PN, Gooris P, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JR. Risk factors for common complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;44(9):1170-80.
3. Hunsuck E. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg. 1968;26:249-52.
4. Veras R, Kriwalsky M, Hoffmann S, Maurer P, Schubert J. Functional and radiographic long-term results after bad split in orthognathic surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2008;37(7):606-11.
5. Chrcanovic BR, Freire-Maia B. Risk factors and prevention of bad splits during sagittal split osteotomy. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2012;16(1):19-27.
6. Politis C, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, Vrielinck L, Schepers S, Agbaje JO. Attachment rate of the inferior alveolar nerve to buccal plate during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy influences self-reported sensory impairment. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2014;25(6):2121-6.
7. Theodossy T, Jackson O, Petrie A, Lloyd T. Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal following sagittal split osteotomy. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2006;35(7):598-601.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 6, No 3 (Summer 2019) | |
| Section | Technical Note | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jcr.v6i3.3265 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Sagittal split ramus osteotomy; Orthognathic surgery; Skeletal deformity. | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
Parhiz A, Mojtahedi H. Two-point osteotomy technique in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Res. 2020;6(3):129-131.
