Original Article

One jaw or Two jaws? What is current trend among surgeons and orthodontists

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to define the trend of the orthodontists and the surgeons in the borderline Class III patients and assess their satisfaction after the surgery.Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 31 patients (16 female and 15 male) with the average age of 21 years, whose final occlusion 2 months after the surgery was perfect. The amount of reverse overjet was less than 5 mm in all patients. Surgeons and orthodontists made their treatment plan separately and if there were any differences, the surgeon and orthodontist would discuss it and the patient would be treated by the best treatment plan. The patients’ satisfaction at least 5 months after orthognathic surgery was assessed quantitatively by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS) of 10 cm.Result: Among 31 patients entered in this study, orthodontists suggested two-jaw surgery for 61% of patients while surgeons suggested two-jaw surgery for 45% of patients. In 35% of patients, the orthodontist’s treatment plans was different from the surgeon’s, but these differences were not significant (P = 0.23). This shows that the orthodontists’ and surgeons’ current trend in borderline Class III patients (reverse overjet less than 5 mm) is two-jaw surgery. At least 5 months after the surgery, thetotal satisfaction score for appearance was 5 (maximum 7 and minimum 2) and this can indicates that most of the patients see no changes in their appearance or their changes were not significant.Conclusion: Data analysis of this study indicated that there are no differences between orthodontists and surgeons trend in the treatment plan of the borderline patients, but both of them prefer two- jaw surgery (for 55% of patients) for borderline patients (discrepancy less than 5 mm).Keywords: Orthognathic Surgery, One Jaw Surgery, Two Jaws Surgery, Borderline Patient

Ahmed F, Valiathan M. 1505 trends among orthodontists in orthognathic surgery. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Convention Center; 2004.

Cassidy DW, Jr., Herbosa EG, Rotskoff KS, Johnston LE, Jr. A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in "borderline" adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104(5): 455-70.

Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127(4): 451-64.

Mihalik CA, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Long-term follow- up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123(3): 266-78.

Cheng LH, Roles D, Telfer MR. Orthognathic surgery:the patients' perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36(4): 261-3.

Finlay PM, Atkinson JM, Moos KF. Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33(1): 9-14.

Crowell NT, Sazima HJ, Elder ST. Survey of patients' attitudes after surgical correction of prognathism: study of 33 patients. J Oral Surg 1970; 28(11): 818-22.

Olson RE, Laskin DM. Expectations of patients from orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1980; 38(4): 283-5.

Kiyak HA, West RA, Hohl T, McNeill RW. The psychological impact of orthognathic surgery:a 9- month follow-up. Am J Orthod 1982; 81(5): 404-12.

Kiyak HA, Hohl T, West RA, McNeill RW. Psychologic changes in orthognathic surgery patients: a 24-month follow up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42(8): 506-12.

Garvill J, Garvill H, Kahnberg KE, Lundgren S.Psychological factors in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992; 20(1): 28-33.

Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP, Feinmann C. Perceptions of outcome following orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34(3): 210-3.

Lovius BB, Jones RB, Pospisil OA, Reid D, Slade PD, Wynne TH. The specific psychosocial effects of orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990;18(8): 339-42.

Kiyak HA, McNeill RW, West RA, Hohl T, Heaton PJ.Personality characteristics as predictors and sequelae of surgical and conventional orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1986; 89(5): 383-92.

Tucker MR. Orthognathic surgery versus orthodontic camouflage in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53(5): 572-8.

Rabie AB, Wong RW, Min GU. Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery. Open Dent J 2008; 2: 38-48.

Nagamine T, Kobayashi T, Hanada K, Nakajima T.Satisfaction of patients following surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44(12): 944-8.

Posnick JC, Wallace J. Complex orthognathic surgery:assessment of patient satisfaction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66(5): 934-42.

Files
IssueVol 1, No 1-2 (Winter/Spring 2014) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
Keywords
Orthognathic Surgery One Jaw Surgery Two Jaws Surgery Borderline Patient

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Mirhashemi A, Parhiz A. One jaw or Two jaws? What is current trend among surgeons and orthodontists. J Craniomaxillofac Res. 2016;1(1-2):21-24.