Ridge split considerations for the horizontally deficient alveolar ridges according to a new classification for the alveolar ridge width
,
Abstract
Introduction: Among many techniques advocated for the horizontally deficient alveolar ridges, ridge split technique has many advantages.Materials and Methods: Here, the main treatment management strategy of the horizontally collapsed ridges, the ridge split approach, is discussed in detail according to our new ridge widthclassification, with the goal of assisting an operator in choosing the proper bone augmentation technique.Results: Success rate was more than 97 percent with using our protocol in treatment of cases in this study.Conclusion: Choice of the technique is dependent ultimately on operator experience and surgical comfort. The ridge split has many advantages, including lack of donor site morbidity and graft stability over time.Key words: Ridge-split, Alveolar ridge.Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard tissue alterations following immediate implant place- ment in extraction sites. J ClinPeriodontol.2004;31:820–828.
Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T.Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes fol- lowing single tooth extraction: a clinical and ra-diographic 12-month prosthetic study. Int J Peri-odontRestor Dent. 2003;23:313–323.
Arau jo M, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J ClinPeriodontol. 2005;32:212–218.
Cardaropoli G, Arau jo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J ClinPeriodon- tol. 2003;30:809–818.
Qahash M, Susin C, Polimeni G, Hall J, Wikesjo UM. Bone healing dynamics at buccalperi-im- plant sites. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:166-172.
McAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation tech- niques. J Periodontol. 2007;78:377–396.
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmenta- tion procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;1(suppl 2):136–159.
Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmen- tation techniques are the most successful in fur- nishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(suppl): 49–70.
Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Sammartino G, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Horizontal and vertical ridge aug- mentation in localized alveolar deficient sites: a retrospective case series. Implant Dent. 2012;21:175–185.
Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regen- eration and enlargement of jaw bone using guid- ed tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res.1990;1:22–32.
Tolstunov L. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1723–1729.
Bedrossian E, Tawfilis A, Alijanian A. Veneer grafting: a technique for augmentation of the re- sorbed alveolus prior to implant placement. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2000;15:853–858.
Pikos MA. Mandibular block autografts for alveo- lar ridge augmentation. Atlas Oral MaxillofacClin North Am. 2005;13:91–107.
Jensen OT, Cullum DR, Baer D. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for al- veolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study. J Oral axillofac Surg. 2009;67:1921–1930.
Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlarge- ment using immediate implant placement associ- ated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.1992;12:462–473.
Scipioni A, Bruschi GB, Calesini G. The edentu- lous ridge expansion technique: a five-year study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 1994;14:451–459.
Laster Z, Reem Y, Nagler R. Horizontal alveolar ridge distraction in an edentulous patient. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69: 502–506.
Mc Carthy JG. The role of distraction osteogene- sis in the reconstruction of the mandible in uni-lateral craniofacial microso- mia. ClinPlast Surg.1994;21:625–631.
Chin M, Toth BA. Distraction osteogenesis in max- illofacial surgery using internal devises: review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:45–53.
Cawood JI, Howell RA. A classification of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac surg.1988;17:232–236.
Jensen O. Site classification for the osseointegrated implant. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:228–234.
Wang HL, Al-Shammari K. HVC ridge deficiency classifica- tion: a therapeutic oriented classifica- tion. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2002;22:335343.
Adeyemo WL, Reuther T, Bloch W, et al. Influence of host periosteum and recipient bed perforation on the healing of onlay mandibular bone graft: an experimental pilot study in the sheep. Oral Maxil- lofac Surg. 2008;12:19–28.
Barone A, Covani U. Maxillary alveolar ridge re- construction with nonvascularizedautogenous block bone: clinical results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:2039–2046.
Cordaro L, Amade DS, Cordaro M. Clinical re- sults of alveolar ridge augmentation with man- dibular block bone graft in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:103–111.
Casap N, Brand M, Mogyros R, et al. Island osteoperiosteal flaps with interpositional bone grafting in rabbit tibia: preliminary study for development of new bone augmentation technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:3045–3051.
Romero-OlidMde N, Vallencillo-Capilla M. A pilot study in the development of indices for predicting the clinical outcomes of oral bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:595–604.
Tolstunov L. Classification of the Alveolar Ridge Width: Implant-Driven Treatment Considerations for the Horizontally Deficient Alveolar Ridges. J Oral Implanol:2014:40: 36570-.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 3, No 4 (Autumn 2016) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| Keywords | ||
| Ridge-split Alveolar ridge | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
